Dear Bridgers,

Thank you for your nice words in response to my previous posting Colleen.

Before answering your questions, I think I have to make a short introduction about my thesis The Ultimate Unification Theory, and how it relates to Post Quantum Physics. That’s what Peter also would like to have. But Peter, this is not intended to persuade you or giving you any reason to look further into the matter. I just think, it is more appropriate that I give a short introduction, especially to clarify where do I stand.

Firstly, I am not a quantum physicist, and post-quantum physics is not my 'creation'. So Paul, sorry that I couldn't or do not feel to have the authority to answer your question, as what "intuitive science" means.

Jelke, whether you need a degree in nuclear physics or not, solely depends on yourself, how far do you want to 'understand' the subject.

According to me, there are two types of people in this world, the generalist, who knows nothing about everything, and the specialist, who knows everything about nothing. And I’d like to think that I belong to the first group, the generalist.

I like to watch the woods as it changes colors in every season, having some information as what kind of trees are there or what kind of animals lives there, but I am not interested to go into it myself to see any particular tree or animal species living in the woods, because I don't want to lose my beautiful panoramic view of the whole forest.

From everything, that I know nothing of, I’ve put together a grand picture, made a thesis out of it, call it The Ultimate Unification Theory and presented it at the fifth international conference on thinking in Townsville, Australia. It was in July 1992.(It's now available in my web-page, as the 'scientific' basis of what I call Scientific Spirituality, the title of my web-page)

The Ultimate Unification Theory is not only the Unification of all physical laws (in contrast to the Theory of Everything), but also the psychological and the spiritual laws as well. It is simply the basic fundamental law of our Cosmos as a totality.

The Ultimate Unification Theory is a Trinity, comprising of:

1. The Law of One-ness
2. The Law of Polarization
3. The Law of Interrelationship.

In my paper I went quite some lengthy discussion about Eintein’s relativity theory and Quantum Physics, (though I am not a physicist), to prove that the whole cosmos is nothing but undivisible One-ness. (please read One-ness as in a mystical term)

Within the infinite One-ness, there are polarities due to the Law of Polarization, which is also known as The Law of Universal Freewill. And everything we call reality, is nothing but only result of the interactions between polarities. It’s The Law of Interrelationship, which is based on the principle of resonance and induction.

The Ultimate Unification Theory uses a ‘formula’, which is a cross within a circle. The Circle symbolises the One-ness, while the cross symbolises the two basic interrelationships. The horizontal axis symbolises the subject/object interrelationship, which I coined the name ‘exoteric line’, while the vertical axis symbolises the internal, mind/brain or spirit/matter interrelationship or the ‘esoteric line’.

The materialistic science ignores this ‘esoteric line’, or this vertical interrelationship. I mentioned in my paper, that he facts are already there, as in the Jungian Psychology (the Archetypes), as well as proven by Rupert Sheldrake with his Morphogenetic field. But they have been ignored by our physicist, as they ignore all other paranormal phenomena.

And I’ve predicted in 1992, that the crucial point for science to make the next break through, is by acknowledging the existence of this ‘esoteric’ interrelationship and start investigating it.

And exactly this, is now happening with the emergence of the post-quantum physics. There is a group of scientists, called the Physics Consciousness Research Group, lead by Jack Sarfatti Ph.D, who have done quite some works in this area. Some people do not particularly 'like' Jack Sarfatti, but it's beside the point. And of course, there will always be pros and cons amongst the scientists themself.

But, let us wait and see how it will further develop.

Jelke wrote:
It is nice to know that there is a "physical" or "natural" understanding of consciousness but does it really help to know myself, not my emperical self, but my Real Self?

I don’t know the answer from the post-quantum physics, as they are just a new born baby right now. They are still crawling, and still have a lot to catch up and to investigate.

From the perspective of The Ultimate Unification Theory, I’d like to quote the following from my web-page, which is a derivation from the UUT:

Every “I” is the same “I”, which is the Cosmic “I”.
The only difference is the subject pattern, held as point of
reference to experience other patterns, the object.
Due to subject/object polarization, the subject pattern
identify itself as “I am”, having the impressions as being
separated from the rest of the universe, which is it’s illusion.

I do differentiate between science and technology. If we take the above statement as the science part about the "REAL SELF", it still doesn't show you HOW TO achieve or to realize it. It needs the technology, which I am still in search of.

How about putting together a special page on your web-site explaining, in lay-man's terms, what this "back-action" is all about and how it evolved from conventional quantum-mechanics?

It's a good idea, but I wouldn't write it as how it is understood from the quantum physics' point of view. As I said above, I am not a quantum physics specialist. I'd like to know what's going on in those area of research, but am not getting deeply involved myself.

As from the UUT's point of view, it is what I call 'the esoteric line' or the vertical axis interactions, and it follows the same principle of resonance and inductions like any other interactions. And it's already there in my web page.

I know that some people still having difficulties in reading my page, but I also still have some difficulties to 'water it down' to 'laymans term' due to my language problem. Not only that English is not my mother tongue, it's more that the subject is not an easy one.

By doing this kind of discussions, I am learning and doing some exercising with my English. And one day, I hope to be able to write it down in laymans terms.

Happy New Year to you all!

in LIGHT + LOVE

Pramana